[MassHistPres] Demolition Delay Bylaw scope question

[Marcia Starkey]

I have assumed that the jurisdiction for all or most DD bylaws is limited to 
buildings unless the language specifies otherwise.   Marcia Starkey , 
Greenfield
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <knrmcguire at aol.com>
To: <masshistpres at cs.umb.edu>
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 8:15 PM
Subject: [MassHistPres] Demolition Delay Bylaw scope question


> Hi,
>
> I'd be interesting in hearing from communities that
> attempt to preserve objects, stone walls, abandoned
> foundations, etc as part of what is governed as
> part of their implementation of their Demolition Delay Bylaw.
>
> Often times, it is the objects, walls and abandoned foundations on
> a parcel which contribute to the historical context
> to a house or other 'enclosed' structure attempting
> to be saved.
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Roberta McGuire
> Westford Historical Commission
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Check out the new AOL.  Most comprehensive set of free safety and security 
> tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, 
> free AOL Mail and more.
> ******************************
> For administrative questions regarding this list, please contact 
> Christopher.Skelly at state.ma.us directly.  PLEASE DO NOT "REPLY" TO THE 
> WHOLE LIST.
> MassHistPres mailing list
> MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu
> http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/listinfo/masshistpres
> ********************************
>