[MassHistPres] Creating historic districts
Brian Yates
byates at comteam.org
Mon Dec 8 15:14:38 EST 2008
The other argument you'll hear is that it won't let me change the color of
my home. Probably not a big objection in this case but neighbors may fear
an enlarged district. so scotch this one up front. The law doesn't allow a
district to regulate color.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Gretchen Schuler <ggschuler at verizon.net>wrote:
> The process for a single building district or a multi-property district
> is the same in terms of study report which is sent to MHC and local PB -
> public hearing and 2/3 vote of town meeting (or city council). The MHC
> guidebook Establishing a Local Historic District will spell this out for you
> - if you are just adding a single-property district to your existing bylaw
> it should be relatively easy and not nearly as time consuming as a large
> district, because you will have no convincing - just time frames of when
> reports have to be submitted and 60 days that must pass before you can have
> public hearing. Chris Skelly can provide information. It was not clear in
> your e-mail whether other properties would be included in a new district
> which will take more work. If one building - there should be no objections
> from town officials or abutters - particularly if there is an already
> established local historic district commission to assume responsibility of
> regulation. FYI - Somerville has many single building districts.
>
> Gretchen Schuler
> Wayland HDC
>
>
> Dec 8, 2008 05:26:54 PM, Cwkmail at aol.com wrote:
>
> Dear All:
>
> A resident in Shrewsbury, Mass. has suggested that a new local historic
> district be created for her historic home. We are interested in obliging
> her. However, we would like to know the *typical objections that town
> officials, abutters, and others have to the creation of a new local historic
> district* -- so that we can anticipate them and prepare rebuttals.
>
> Shrewsbury already has two local historic districts; however, they were
> created so long ago that no one remembers the details of any arguments
> that arose.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Christopher Kirk
> Shrewsbury Historical Commission
> Shrewsbury, Mass.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and favorite sites in
> one place. Try it now<http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010>
> .
>
> ------------------------------
>
> ******************************
> For administrative questions regarding this list, please contact
> Christopher.Skelly at state.ma.us directly. PLEASE DO NOT "REPLY" TO THE
> WHOLE LIST.
> MassHistPres mailing list
> MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu
> http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/listinfo/masshistpres
> ********************************
>
>
> ******************************
> For administrative questions regarding this list, please contact
> Christopher.Skelly at state.ma.us directly. PLEASE DO NOT "REPLY" TO THE
> WHOLE LIST.
> MassHistPres mailing list
> MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu
> http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/listinfo/masshistpres
> ********************************
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/private/masshistpres/attachments/20081208/f8246390/attachment.htm
More information about the MassHistPres
mailing list