[MassHistPres] TEA easement clauses
Dennis De Witt
djdewitt at rcn.com
Mon Dec 29 21:11:51 EST 2008
Brookline's Selectmen recently approved the town's fourth facade
easement to be held by the Trust for Architectural Easements (formerly
National Architectural Trust) as the easement holder. The three
previous easements were all in LHDs, as is typical with TAE
easements. (During the course of our negotiations with them their
counsel told us that 80-85% of their easements are in LHDs.)
When the last one came up we had requested and got clauses requiring
that vinyl windows in that particular house would have to be replaced
with windows consistent with our LHD guidelines when the time came to
replace them (no like-kind replacement of vinyl with vinyl), that LHD
design review would happen first, and that the Brookline Preservation
Commission would become the successor easement holder if TAE should
ever expire.
As this most recent easement (for an NR Greek Revival house) was not
in an NRD we got an advisory design review role for the Commission
written into the easement, as well as a modified version of the
successor clause.
Here are the two clauses that were added to the standard TAE easement
language.
The added language relating to advisory design review begins with
"provided however . . . ." in the first paragraph:
Grantor and Grantee agree to abide by the Change Approval Guidelines
attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment C, and such
Change Approval Guidelines will not be amended without the express
written consent of the Massachusetts Historical Commission (the
“MHC”); provided, however, that nothing in the Change Approval
Guidelines shall limit the Town of Brookline’s right, as set forth
below, to provide meaningful comment on any Proposed Modification
Request.
In order to approve this Agreement, the Town of Brookline requires
that Grantee shall provide notice to the Brookline Preservation
Commission (the “BPC”) of any Proposed Modification Request submitted
by Grantor and shall allow the BPC the opportunity to provide Grantee
with (a) historic and architectural information regarding the Property
and (b) a Statement of Applicability with respect to the Proposed
Modification Request of any relevant provision of the BPC’s Design
Guidelines for Local Historic Districts adopted by the BPC on October
12, 2005 and attached hereto as Attachment E (“Brookline
Guidelines”). In connection with the Town of Brookline’s notice
requirement, Grantor and Grantee hereby agree as follows:
(i) Grantee shall notify the BPC’s Preservation Planner at the
Department of Planning and Community Development, Preservation
Division, Town Hall, 333 Washington Street, Brookline, Massachusetts,
02445 (“BPC Staff’) each time it receives a Proposed Modification
Request or revision thereto from Grantor. (“PMR Notice”). The PMR
Notice shall be in writing, shall include the Proposed Modification
Request form (excluding attachments) and may be sent via email to BPC
Staff.
(ii) BPC Staff shall have three (3) business days following receipt of
the PMR Notice to notify Grantee in writing, including email, that BPC
either requests or does not request a copy of the Proposed
Modification Request and to indicate which portions or attachments of
the request to provide to BPC Staff. Failure by BPC Staff to respond
to the PMR Notice within 3 business days shall be deemed by Grantor to
indicate that BPC does not intend to comment on the Proposed
Modification Request. If timely requested, Grantee shall provide a
copy of the specified portions of the Proposed Modification Request
(“PMR Plans”) to BPC Staff. The cost of reproduction, if any, shall
be the responsibility of Grantor, and all reasonable efforts will be
made to deliver electronic copies of the PMR Plans to BPC Staff.
(iii) Grantee agrees to review and consider any historic and
architectural research or information relating to the Property and the
BPC’s Statement of Applicability of the Brookline Guidelines, if such
information is provided to Grantee within seven (7) business days
following the BPC Staff’s receipt of the PMR Plans.
(iv) If Grantee’s final determination regarding the Proposed
Modification Request, as may be modified by Grantor, is inconsistent
with the BPC’s Statement of Applicability, including subsequent
communications between Grantor and BPC Staff, Grantee agrees shall
send written communication to BPC Staff providing Grantee’s rationale
for issuing a final statement of no objection to Grantor’s Proposed
Modification Request.
Grantee and Grantor hereby further agree and acknowledge that the
Property is not subject to the Town of Brookline Preservation
Commission and Historic District Bylaw 5.6 as of the date of this
Agreement. Further, as stated above in this Section 1, Grantee’s
consent shall only be given if in compliance with standards set forth
in Applicable Preservation Laws and such consent may be withheld,
conditioned or delayed in the sole and absolute discretion of Grantee.
And this is the added language relating to succession:
c) Grantee agrees that if in the future it shall be required, either
for financial or legal reasons, to transfer all or substantially all
of its assets to other qualified organizations it shall transfer,
assign and otherwise convey its rights under this Agreement to the
BPC, assuming that at the time of the transfer, the BPC (i) is a
“qualified organization” described in Section 170(h)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and controlling Treasury regulations,
(ii) is an organization whose purposes are to promote preservation or
conservation of historical, cultural or architectural resources, and
(iii) agrees to continue to carry out the conservation purposes for
which this Agreement was created.
Dennis De Witt
Brookline
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/private/masshistpres/attachments/20081229/5e68db46/attachment.htm
More information about the MassHistPres
mailing list