[MassHistPres] Rebuilding after demolition
Dcolebslade at aol.com
Dcolebslade at aol.com
Fri Jan 11 22:21:37 EST 2008
The architect working for an owner in the historic district who has
demolished a substantial portion of an 1803 house is stating that since most of the
house is gone, that the rest should be torn down and a new house of a similar
external appearance can be built, but with new materials if they so desire,
and that the historic district commission has no say over that. A good
portion of the building and roofing structure that collapsed has been saved
through quick action by the building inspector although it is on the ground and in
dumpsters. The architect challenged the commission with the following two
questions:
(1) Is there any requirement in Chapter 40C or bylaw that states that
original materials be used in a renovation?
(2) Does the Commission have oversight over internal framing?
Your responses were most helpful in how other commissions have dealt with
the issue of demolition and rebuilding. I am hoping that you can give us some
insight into your responses to these questions - within the context of
demolition.
Thank you. Betty Slade, Westport
**************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape.
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489
More information about the MassHistPres
mailing list