[MassHistPres] Demo review procedures

[BLever3043 at aol.com]

Perhaps I am not being clear.  What I am looking for are examples of  how 
other commissions operate their demolition review.  It is a  procedural question. 
 In particular how is the determination made with  regards to subjecting a 
building to a delay.  Is the entire building  determined to be significant and 
subjected to delay or only portions  (example: if no one can see the rear of a 
historic building as it is  located away from a street surrounded by trees 
would a commission determine it  not significant because you can't see it or find 
it significant as it is part of  an overall building considered significant). 
 Obviously portions  of a building contribute to the whole, I am not arguing 
that, I am trying to  find out how other commissions operate.  A member of the 
Brookline  commission responded to me that they find the entire building as 
significant or  not.  How do others do it?  
 
Again thanks for the help,
 
Brian Lever



**************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money & 
Finance.      (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)