[MassHistPres] Demo review procedures

[Dcolebslade at aol.com]

So far, Westport has defined  the whole building  preferably preserved or 
not.  
 
Betty Slade
Westport
 
In a message dated 3/5/2008 8:28:05 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
BLever3043 at aol.com writes:

Perhaps  I am not being clear.  What I am looking for are examples of  how  
other commissions operate their demolition review.  It is a   procedural 
question. 
In particular how is the determination made  with  regards to subjecting a 
building to a delay.  Is the  entire building  determined to be significant 
and 
subjected to delay  or only portions  (example: if no one can see the rear of 
a 
historic  building as it is  located away from a street surrounded by trees  
would a commission determine it  not significant because you can't  see it or 
find 
it significant as it is part of  an overall building  considered 
significant). 
Obviously portions  of a building contribute  to the whole, I am not arguing 
that, I am trying to  find out how  other commissions operate.  A member of 
the 
Brookline   commission responded to me that they find the entire building as  
significant or  not.  How do others do it?  

Again  thanks for the help,

Brian Lever



**************It's Tax  Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money & 
Finance.      (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)
******************************
For  administrative questions regarding this list, please contact  
Christopher.Skelly at state.ma.us directly.  PLEASE DO NOT "REPLY" TO THE  WHOLE LIST.  
MassHistPres mailing  list
MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu
http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/listinfo/masshistpres
********************************





**************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money & 
Finance.      (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)