[MassHistPres] Areas of Water on the NR
Bjdurk at aol.com
Bjdurk at aol.com
Tue Nov 10 11:07:14 EST 2009
Hi Paul:
The historic preservation of (High) sensitivity archaeological sites such
as Nantucket Sound would extend benefits to rate and taxpayers, migratory
and endangered birds, and prevent the installation of Cape Wind where
compelling testimony of record indicates it would pose a public safety hazard.
The historic and present use, and features present in Nantucket Sound, make
it unsuitable for industrialization by Cape Wind, for reasons cited in this
letter:
November 9, 2009
To the Honorable Chairman Markey and the House Select Committee on Energy
Independence and Global Warming:
According to the November 9, 2009 Wall Street Journal, "the chairman of
the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, Rep.
Edward Markey (D., Mass.) urged Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to make a
decision before the UN summit on a Massachusetts company’s proposal to build a
wind farm off Cape Cod. The project – known as Cape Wind."
“Approving the Cape Wind project as the nation’s first commercial
offshore wind project before the start of the U.N. conference would send a strong
message to international negotiators about the United States’ commitment to
developing sources of clean energy and reducing global warming pollution,”
Mr. Markey _said in a letter_
(http://globalwarming.house.gov/mediacenter/letters?id=0040#main_content) to Mr. Salazar made public Monday."
_http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2009/11/09/climate-fight-epa-send
s-global-warming-finding-to-white-house/_
(http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2009/11/09/climate-fight-epa-sends-global-warming-finding-to-white-
house/)
However; Page 47 MMS Final OCS rules state:
"Based on comments received on the NPR, MMS added a requirement to this
section that in order to qualify to become a lessee or a grant holder, the
applicant must demonstrate technical and financial capabilities to construct,
operate and maintain, and terminate/decommission projects for which you
are requesting authorization."
_http://www.mms.gov/offshore/AlternativeEnergy/PDFs/AD30RenewableEnergy04-22
-09.pdf_
(http://www.mms.gov/offshore/AlternativeEnergy/PDFs/AD30RenewableEnergy04-22-09.pdf)
This OCS "Lease" section applies to Cape Wind, at minimum. Cape Wind does
not have technical capability to construct Cape Wind as they have no
manufacturing source for their wind turbines. Cape Wind has no wind turbine
purchase contract, project financing, or a Power Purchase Agreement.
Thusly, Cape Wind is not qualified to become a MMS lessee under the Final
OCS rules.
Furthermore: The National Environmental Policy Act provides assurance of
public safety threatened by Cape Wind as proposed for Nantucket Sound.
_http://bjdurk.newsvine.com/_news/2009/09/19/3290406-cape-wind-a-public-safe
ty-hazard-proposed-for-nantucket-sound_
(http://bjdurk.newsvine.com/_news/2009/09/19/3290406-cape-wind-a-public-safety-hazard-proposed-for-nantucket-sou
nd) -
Additionally: Cape Wind, proposed for a migratory flyway, should be
reasonably anticipated to violate the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, a strict
liability criminal statute--and avoided.
_http://bjdurk.newsvine.com/_news/2009/03/11/2534556-dear-secretary-salazar-
please-do-not-sign-off-on-cape-wind_
(http://bjdurk.newsvine.com/_news/2009/03/11/2534556-dear-secretary-salazar-please-do-not-sign-off-on-cape-wind) -
The Cape Wind review v taxpayers and ratepayers (Cape Wind does not
provide a fair return to the Nation for the use of our resources):
_http://bjdurk.newsvine.com/_news/2009/05/13/2813446-cape-wind-offshore-proj
ect-review-v-taxpayers-and-ratepayers_
(http://bjdurk.newsvine.com/_news/2009/05/13/2813446-cape-wind-offshore-project-review-v-taxpayers-and-ratepayers
)
Cape Wind is in conflict with the OCS Final Rules:
_http://bjdurk.polls.newsvine.com/_news/2009/05/13/2813346-cape-wind-is-in-c
onflict-with-final-ocs-rules-and-applicable-laws?threadId=0_
(http://bjdurk.polls.newsvine.com/_news/2009/05/13/2813346-cape-wind-is-in-conflict-with-fi
nal-ocs-rules-and-applicable-laws?threadId=0)
Most Respectfully,
Barbara Durkin
Northboro, MA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/private/masshistpres/attachments/20091110/a2f2eeb3/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the MassHistPres
mailing list