[MassHistPres] demolition permit question

[Garrett Laws]

Can't it be argued that the words "Vacant" and "Use" make this a non issue!

Cheers,
Garrett

Garrett Laws, Manager
The Copper & Slate Company
Fine Roofing and Exterior Finish Carpentry
238B Calvary Street
Waltham, MA 02453
Ph: (781) 893-1916
Fax: (781) 209-0701

Copperandslate at Gmail.com


On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:11 PM, melanie deware <smdeware at hotmail.com> wrote:

>  For those of you who may be following our news, Easton may be facing
> the demolition of our historic Shovel Shops/Ames Shovel Works complex.
> During discussions, the question was raised as to whether "vacant lot" was a
> suitable reuse of the property as indicated by the owner on the demolition
> application.   We have heard many differing opinions on the answer.  Anyone
> know of any precedent that may help the Historical Commission (we believe it
> is not a suitable reuse)?
>
> Melanie Deware
> Chairman, Easton Historical Commission
>
> ******************************
> For administrative questions regarding this list, please contact
> Christopher.Skelly at state.ma.us directly.  PLEASE DO NOT "REPLY" TO THE
> WHOLE LIST.
> MassHistPres mailing list
> MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu
> http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/listinfo/masshistpres
> ********************************
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/private/masshistpres/attachments/20100101/9d44ccf6/attachment.htm>