[MassHistPres] Historic Exterior Paint

[Annie Harris]

Sara
What is the paint product that you used?

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 6, 2011, at 8:44 AM, "Sara Molyneaux" <meauxmo1 at comcast.net<mailto:meauxmo1 at comcast.net>> wrote:

I used paints that professionals recommended for two decades on centuries-old clapboards and trim, before switching to a brand that truly performs as promised and comes with extended guarantees. It is worth every penny spent on the better product, and I know that there is no "equivalent" for it. The better product can be a bit more difficult to apply (because it is quite latex-y) so not all painters will recommend it. If you insist on it though, a firm that is worth hiring should go along with it. If they won't I might wonder what other corners they might cut, on your job site.

Sara Molyneaux
Dover Mass. 02030

On Aug 5, 2011, at 8:48 PM, Joseph Ouellette wrote:

Hi Joe, I'd have the matter turned over to your consultant to validate the low bidder's paint as an equivalent to that specified or justify the reasons for rejection as not meeting the specifications of the paint. Have the consultant justify his position one way or the other. I'm sure components of each manufacturer's standards of quality, durability and guarantee positions could be evaluated and justified.

Joe Ouellette
Town of Sturbridge
Historical Commission
----- Original Message -----
From: Joseph Larson<mailto:larson at tei.umass.edu>
To: 'Mass Hist Preservation'<mailto:masshistpres at cs.umb.edu>
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 4:21 PM
Subject: [MassHistPres] Historic Exterior Paint

The Town of Pelham recently issued a request for bids to paint the 1743 Pelham Meetinghouse. The bid request specified a particular brand and type of paint, as recommended by a professional historic painting consultant who inspected the building’s exterior. We did not allow for “equivalent” brands. The low bidder refuses to use the specified paint. He wants to use the brand of paint that he sells. The second bidder will use the specified paint. It will cost us more, but we can afford it.

The low bidder will file a complaint if we go to the second bidder because he says his brand is equivalent. The second bidder will file a complaint if we award the job to the low bidder because we changed the terms under which he bid. Our Selectmen may decide to reject both and re-bid the project.

Does anyone have advice on this problem? If we re-bid, how can we ensure that a high quality paint is used, not just what a bidder can provide because he gets it cheaper?


Joseph S. Larson, Chairman
Town of Pelham
Historical Commission
27 Arnold Road
Pelham, Mass. 01002-9757
413-256-8256


******************************
For administrative questions regarding this list, please contact <mailto:Christopher.Skelly at state.ma.us> Christopher.Skelly at state.ma.us<mailto:Christopher.Skelly at state.ma.us> directly.  PLEASE DO NOT "REPLY" TO THE WHOLE LIST.
MassHistPres mailing list
<mailto:MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu>MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu<mailto:MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu>
<http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/listinfo/masshistpres>http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/listinfo/masshistpres
********************************
******************************
For administrative questions regarding this list, please contact <mailto:Christopher.Skelly at state.ma.us> Christopher.Skelly at state.ma.us<mailto:Christopher.Skelly at state.ma.us> directly.  PLEASE DO NOT "REPLY" TO THE WHOLE LIST.
MassHistPres mailing list
<mailto:MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu>MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu<mailto:MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu>
<http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/listinfo/masshistpres>http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/listinfo/masshistpres
********************************

<ATT00001..txt>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/private/masshistpres/attachments/20110806/59a57592/attachment-0001.htm>