[MassHistPres] Are there any successful 'demolition by neglect' bylaws?
SCeccacci at aol.com
SCeccacci at aol.com
Wed Jun 1 07:01:38 EDT 2011
The City of Worcester has a "nuisance" ordinance, which works as a
demolition by neglect ordinance. Including daily fines, it was used successfully
in a case of a building included on Preservation Worcester's Most
Endangered List a couple of years ago. The owner decided to sell rather than to
repair the building, which has since been restored and sold to a new owner.
You may read the ordinance on this link:
_http://www.worcesterma.gov/uploads/be/6e/be6ec0e1b2459ab1cd0597c562386186/n
uisance-ordinance.pdf_
(http://www.worcesterma.gov/uploads/be/6e/be6ec0e1b2459ab1cd0597c562386186/nuisance-ordinance.pdf)
Susan McDaniel Ceccacci
Architectural Historian
Jefferson, Massachusetts
In a message dated 6/1/2011 6:36:48 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
dbibel at verizon.net writes:
Here's the situation: A private school moved into town. They have done
some good things to their property, but one of the buildings they own,
the Jacob Cushman house, has been neglected and is in poor shape. The
Historical Commission has contacted the school, sent letters, met with
one of their Trustees - all in an effort to explain the historical
significance of the building. We've suggested some low cost options to
reduce continued damage (cut down the vines creeping up the walls,
properly seal the damaged windows) to no apparent effect.
Some members of our Commission have suggested writing to the various
members of their Board of Trustees; others have suggested informational
pickets; and one has suggested the development of a 'demolition by
neglect' bylaw.
(I should mention that the school successfully restored an adjacent
property - the William Chenery House, also an historic building, and has
rented it out. We congratulated the school for their adaptive reuse in
this case)
I wonder if there have been successful demo by neglect bylaws or
statutes -- a concern that has been raised is dealing with property
owners who neglect their property due to financial hardship (the school
in question here does plead hardship, although it is not apparent from
their buildings and grounds).
Any examples or case studies (pro or con) would be greatly appreciated.
Daniel Bibel
Co-chair
Medfield Historical Commission
******************************
For administrative questions regarding this list, please contact
Christopher.Skelly at state.ma.us directly. PLEASE DO NOT "REPLY" TO THE WHOLE LIST.
MassHistPres mailing list
MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu
http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/listinfo/masshistpres
********************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/private/masshistpres/attachments/20110601/112be2f3/attachment.htm>
More information about the MassHistPres
mailing list