[MassHistPres] Demolition Delay inquiry

[Blever3043]

Hello All,

In Newton one of our Aldermen is challenging the "vagueness" of our Demolition Delay ordinance specifically the criteria by which the Historical Commission determines a building preferably preserved (put on delay).  We have a two step process first a determination of historical significance (requiring demo review by Commission) and then whether or not the building is found preferably preserved.  We have specific criteria for historical significance 50+ years and NR listed or associated with a historic person ect.  

The determination of preferably preserved or not is as follows:


“If the commissionfinds that the demolition proposed in the application would result in thedemolition of a historically significant building or structure whose loss wouldbe detrimental to the historical or architectural heritage or resources of theCity of Newton, then the commission shall find that the building or structureshould be preferably preserved.”



This is the section regarded as too vague.  As far as I can tell from looking at other demo delays this is pretty standard.  Does any community have more specified language for a detrimental loss?  If so could you send me a copy or link to your ordinance.





Thanks,




Brian Lever







 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/private/masshistpres/attachments/20110317/8740ed32/attachment-0001.htm>