[MassHistPres] LHD commission refuses proposed new construction?

[Tom Ehrgood]

Is no change at all allowed in Camelot?  Vonnegut's bugs in amber?  In Amherst, we see change as inevitable. 

Tom Ehrgood
Chair, Dickinson Local Historic District Commission

> On Jul 29, 2014, at 15:58, "David Feigenbaum" <david.feigenbaum at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Folks--
> 
> I would be grateful for help with the following scenario:
> 
> A small local historic district (let's call it Camelot LHD) has a picturesque street with a few houses on both sides that are significant to the district architecturally and historically. The street was part of a late 19th century planned community.
> 
> One house owned by a guy named (for reasons that will become apparent) Reardon rests at the back of the lot with its historic front facade facing the picturesque street across a long front lawn.
> 
> Reardon sells his house and lot to a guy named (for reasons that will also become apparent--I think you know where I am going with this) Frontenac, a developer.
> 
> Frontenac decides to split the lot in two along a dividing line that runs across the front lawn parallel to the street and then to build a second house on the newly created front lot. Assume that under the relevant zoning bylaw there is no question that Frontenac has the legal right to create the new lot and to build the proposed new house on the lot (setbacks are met, etc.) Assume also that the proposed house is (considered in a vacuum) architecturally appropriate for the district.
> 
> But here's the rub. The new house will obscure a good portion of the facade of the original house from view from the street and will disrupt the uninterrupted sweep of the historic park-like lawns that run in front of several houses along the street.
> 
> In other words, taking all circumstances into account, permitting ANY house to be built on the front lot will likely significantly hurt the architectural and historic character of the district.
> 
> My questions:
> 
> 1. Are there any examples of LHD commissions in Massachusetts refusing to give a certificate of appropriateness for the building of ANY house of any kind or size on a lot in such circumstances? Or in any other circumstances for that matter? If so, were they able to make the refusal "stick?"
> 
> 2. Is there any case law on either side of the issue?
> 
> Thank you for your help.
> 
> David Feigenbaum
> unaffiliated citizen
> 
> ******************************
> For administrative questions regarding this list, please contact Christopher.Skelly at state.ma.us directly.  PLEASE DO NOT "REPLY" TO THE WHOLE LIST.
> MassHistPres mailing list
> MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu
> http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/listinfo/masshistpres
> ********************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/private/masshistpres/attachments/20140729/8c840e94/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
******************************
For administrative questions regarding this list, please contact Christopher.Skelly at state.ma.us directly.  PLEASE DO NOT "REPLY" TO THE WHOLE LIST.
MassHistPres mailing list
MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu
http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/listinfo/masshistpres
********************************