[MassHistPres] Environmental hazards of demolition of older homes

[jade at heartwoodrestoration.com]

a difficult topic all around...all construction and deconstruction  
should be safe
and have no adverse affects on inhabitants or the community currently  
or in the future...that said, it appears
we continue to manufacture and use products known to be carcinogens or  
otherwise quite unhealthy for
the environment and those living in it be they mammals, fish, bird,  
reptiles, etc...
round-up, fiberglass insulation and vinyl products to name just a few...

I sent laura from west newton hill preservation links to EPA regs  
which appear to be lacking...

jean, I agree we should work towards eliminating demolition as an easy  
option...

maybe we could all be influential in setting standards...

sheesh, we have our work cut out!

.....jade
jade Mortimer
heartwood window restoration

Quoting Dennis De Witt <djd184 at verizon.net>:

> Jean
>
> I would would be concerned that a more likely outcome is the sort of  
> overreaction that leads to even greater disincentives to preserve  
> original fabric, as both Jade and Garret have suggested.
>
> For instance, we are already in an era where the “This Old House”  
> syndrome leads to almost routine total gut rehabs in LHDs, with a  
> total loss of historic interior fabric — which generally is not  
> replaced like-kind.  Providing an additional excuse for such  
> behavior would just exacerbate the problem
>
> Dennis De Witt
> Brookline
>
>
>> On May 3, 2018, at 7:17 AM, Carroon, Jean  
>> <Jean.Carroon at goodyclancy.com> wrote:
>>
>> Doesn’t it make sense to make demolition as expensive as possible?  
>> Whether that be in the dismantling or environmental protections or  
>> the closing of landfills to construction waste?
>>
>> Jean Carroon, FAIA, LEED Fellow
>> Principal - Design, Preservation and Sustainability
>> 617 262 2760 (main) 617 850 6651 (direct) 617 285 5936 (mobile)
>> jean.carroon at goodyclancy.com <mailto:jean.carroon at goodyclancy.com>
>> www.goodyclancy.com <http://www.goodyclancy.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: MassHistPres <masshistpres-bounces at cs.umb.edu  
>> <mailto:masshistpres-bounces at cs.umb.edu>> On Behalf Of Garrett Laws
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2018 5:03 PM
>> To: Dennis De Witt <djd184 at verizon.net <mailto:djd184 at verizon.net>>
>> Cc: MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu <mailto:MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu>
>> Subject: Re: [MassHistPres] Environmental hazards of demolition of  
>> older homes
>>
>> All,
>>
>> It already is, just look at developers tearing off the entire  
>> exterior of buildings saying that they are making them safer by  
>> getting rid of the lead paint. Oh, and the 100-150 year old, old  
>> growth siding is going too.
>>
>> Garrett
>> Copper & Slate
>>
>> On Tuesday, May 1, 2018, Dennis De Witt <djd184 at verizon.net  
>> <mailto:djd184 at verizon.net>> wrote:
>> There is a courtroom lawyer’s adage about never asking a question  
>> to which you do not know the answer.  There may be a corollary to  
>> that applicable to this concept.
>>
>> One might be cautious about raising such alarms, all of whose long  
>> term repercussions not be fully anticipated.  I’d be concerned that  
>> it could come back to bite the preservation community.
>>
>> Dennis De Witt
>> Brookline
>>
>>
>> On May 1, 2018, at 6:43 AM, WN Hill Preservation  
>> <wnhpreservation at gmail.com <mailto:wnhpreservation at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> We are looking for input on the public health and environmental  
>> consequences of demolitions of historic homes.
>>
>> Based on research  
>> <http://www.aecf.org/resources/responsible-demolition-a-baltimore-case-study-with-national-implications/> there are risks of lead and asbestos contamination to air and soil. Apparently cities in other parts of the country such as Baltimore, Detroit and Portland Oregon have stricter guidelines than we seem to have in Newton. In Portland, OR pre-1916 homes need to be dismantled piece by piece for maximum reuse, which is consistent with minimizing usable materials going to  
>> landfill.
>>
>> The minimum steps for safely would seem to include testing the soil  
>> and air before and after demolitions, and giving advance notice to  
>> neighbors to close windows and keep children, pets and vegetable  
>> gardens safe, but this doesn't seem to be the practice here.
>>
>> An 1855 house in our neighborhood on West Newton Hill is being sold  
>> to a developer and is under immediate threat. Would be interested  
>> to know of any research on public health risks of demolitions of  
>> older homes in Massachusetts.
>>
>> Also are there stricter guidelines in force in other communities in  
>> Massachusetts  about what happens when older structures are  
>> demolished? (eg monitoring; notifying neighbors of risks; requiring  
>> salvage rather than disposal of intact architectural components)
>>
>> Laura Foote, West Newton Hill Preservation Initiative
>>
>>
>> WNHpreservation.org <http://wnhpreservation.org/>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MassHistPres mailing list
>> MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu <mailto:MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu>
>> http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/listinfo/masshistpres  
>> <http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/listinfo/masshistpres>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Garrett Laws
>>
>> The Copper & Slate Company, Inc.
>> Fine Roofing and Exterior Finish Carpentry
>> 238 Calvary Street,
>> Waltham, MA 02453
>> Office: (781) 893-1916