[MassHistPres] Section 106 Review for CDBG/ARPA funding

[John Daly]

Hi Ralph,

CDBG grants are a HUD program and HUD is ultimately the lead federal agency
for purposes of Section 106. However, HUD has devolved some of its 106
responsibilities to borrowers or "responsible entities". See the attached
HUD memo.

You can check out the cultural resources information on the HUD website:
https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/environmental-review/historic-preservation/
.

The HUD map has specific guidance on steps applicants must follow (that's
where I got the attached memo):
https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/housing/mfh/map/maphome

Happy Holidays!

John

On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 9:33 PM Ralph Slate <slater at alum.rpi.edu> wrote:

> Does anyone know where the responsibility lies for CDBG or ARPA funding
> used for National Register Districts/properties? Is it the responsibility
> of the municipality receiving the funds to require a developer who is
> granted funds to do a Section 106 Review? And if the municipality doesn't
> do that, does that mean that no review is required? If the Section 106
> review is not done, is the municipality at risk of having the funding
> revoked retroactively?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ralph Slate
> Springfield, MA
> _______________________________________________
> MassHistPres mailing list
> MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu
> https://mailman.cs.umb.edu/listinfo/masshistpres
>


-- 
John Daly
508.353.6441
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/pipermail/masshistpres/attachments/20211222/2189d8dd/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: HUD delegation memo from MAP guide.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 2347111 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/pipermail/masshistpres/attachments/20211222/2189d8dd/attachment-0001.docx>