Assembling the teams
After ranking the projects and choosing which four we would do (see ratings discussion below), each student provided
first and second project choices. Here's how the choices were
distributed:
Number of first, second choices
5, 4 dna to protein mapping ( Professor
Brian White)
3, 5 breast oncology graphics
(
Dr. Kevin Hughes)
4, 1 voice transcript data mining (Dr. Jeff
Fried, Unveil Technologies)
2, 4 searchlets
(Paul English)
In order to honor the greatest number of first choices, I changed team
sizes: three each for data mining and searchlets, four each for the
other two projects. That means the technically challenging projects
have smaller teams. But we know how to deal with that: we adjust the
scope so that what we can do we can do well.
Here are the assignments:
dna to protein mapping
Sumana Adma
Chitra Karki
Prasoon Kejriwal (lead)
Ziping Zhu
breast oncology graphics
Pradeep Kanneganti
Andi Sutedja (lead)
Bipin Vaddi
Shih-ying Yang
voice transcript data mining
Vikas Dua
Shantanu Inamdar (lead)
Yan Sun
searchlets
Chuanquan Liu
Di Luo
Satish Vemuri (lead)
Results of class discussion, September 18
We rated the projects by secret ballot on each of a number of
attributes. Note that most of the attributes don't have simple
good/bad semantics - there are reasons
for and against choosing an easy project. The fact that one will be
used by lots of people and another might provide proof of concept for
just one does not make one better than the other. Some of course do
equate to good/bad - for example "is this fun?".
Note too that these are the opinions of prospective
software engineers, not experienced managers.
After we collected this information we talked about it and came to
our
decision. There was no formal voting, nor any formal weighting of the
scores on the various attributes.
These tables just summarize the information we
we wanted in front of us when we made our choices.
You need not read through the data to know what they were. These
are the four projects for the year:
dna to protein mapping ( Professor
Brian White)
breast oncology graphics
(
Dr. Kevin Hughes)
voice transcript data mining (Dr. Jeff Fried, Unveil Technologies)
searchlets
(Paul English)
Is the project feasible? Is there some reasonable subset of the scope
that we think we can actually do in the time allotted?
|
yes
|
maybe
|
no |
dna
to protein mapping |
14
|
0
|
0
|
breast
oncology graphics |
13
|
1
|
0
|
ecoflyer
(macroscope)
|
12
|
8
|
4
|
forensic
botany
|
12
|
2
|
0
|
voice
transcript data mining |
3
|
9
|
2
|
searchlets |
4
|
7
|
3
|
Would this project be fun/interesting to work on?
|
yes
|
maybe
|
no |
dna
to protein mapping |
12
|
1
|
1
|
breast
oncology graphics |
13
|
1
|
0
|
ecoflyer
(macroscope)
|
2
|
8
|
4
|
forensic
botany
|
12
|
2
|
0
|
voice
transcript data mining |
9
|
4
|
1
|
searchlets |
5
|
8
|
1
|
Would the product be used after we finished it?
|
yes
|
maybe
|
no |
dna
to protein mapping |
14
|
0
|
0
|
breast
oncology graphics |
7
|
4
|
3
|
ecoflyer
(macroscope)
|
6
|
6
|
2
|
forensic
botany
|
12
|
2
|
0
|
voice
transcript data mining |
9
|
4
|
1
|
searchlets |
5
|
8
|
1
|
How difficult is the project?
|
hard |
OK
|
easy
|
dna
to protein mapping |
2
|
10
|
2 |
breast
oncology graphics |
3
|
6 |
5 |
ecoflyer
(macroscope)
|
13
|
1
|
0 |
forensic
botany
|
1
|
11 |
2 |
voice
transcript data mining |
10
|
4 |
0 |
searchlets |
11
|
3 |
0 |
Would you learn from this project?
|
yes
|
maybe
|
no |
dna
to protein mapping |
7
|
6
|
1
|
breast
oncology graphics |
4
|
7
|
3
|
ecoflyer
(macroscope)
|
12
|
2
|
0
|
forensic
botany
|
12
|
2
|
0
|
voice
transcript data mining |
13
|
1
|
0
|
searchlets |
12
|
2
|
0
|
Are you willing to do this project?
|
yes
|
maybe
|
no |
dna
to protein mapping |
10
|
2
|
2
|
breast
oncology graphics |
11
|
1
|
2
|
ecoflyer
(macroscope)
|
1
|
5
|
8
|
forensic
botany
|
10
|
4
|
0
|
voice
transcript data mining |
6
|
3
|
5
|
searchlets |
3
|
5
|
6
|