CS682
Spring (technical) presentation evaluation form

April 20, 2010

Project (circle one)     See3PO   TBS   VisitMe                         CS682 student (circle one)     Yes   No

Use the numerical scale provided for the first few statements (all phrased so that 5 is good, 1 is bad, 0 is (not applicable, no opinion). The last few questions ask for free form comments - use the other side of this paper if you need more space.

  1. 5 4 3 2 1 0 - Technical topics chosen were interesting and appropriate.

  2. 5 4 3 2 1 0 - Speakers focussed on the audience (not just on the material), adjusted pacing and level of explanation in response to feedback (explicit and implicit).

  3. 5 4 3 2 1 0 - Questions elicited, answered well.

  4. 5 4 3 2 1 0 - Slides well designed (right number, right amount of information on each, minimal boilerplate, easy to read).

  5. If you were unfamiliar with the technology, do you now know something new? If you knew the material, would you recommend this treatment to someone who didn't?






  6. What was the best/most interesting/most memorable part of the presentation? Why?






  7. How might the presentation be improved?






    Other comments (over)?