[MassHistPres] ACHP Comments on the Cape Wind Project
Bjdurk at aol.com
Bjdurk at aol.com
Tue Apr 6 15:48:50 EDT 2010
Thank you, Ms. Nicholas. The "authority on these matters" you mention
claims 10,000 years of stewardship over this amphibious resource, once dry
land.
Barbara Durkin
Northboro, MA
Resources:
Video: Noting the extraordinary leap of faith on the part of the largest
assembly in the history of our nation of Native American's, President Obama
made a promise to have meaningful consultation with Tribes. "Today's
conference is not lip service" stated our President, the adopted son of the
Crow:
_http://www.ncai.org/Nation-to-Nation-The-United-S.447.0.html_
(http://www.ncai.org/Nation-to-Nation-The-United-S.447.0.html)
"For those not familiar with Native culture, it can be hard to see the
sacred spaces of America as Native people have seen them for thousands of
years, but most Americans would understand that you could never build a wind
turbine farm on top of the Gettysburg battlefield."
“The Wampanoag were the first people of Noepe. For thousands of years
these People of the First Light have been partners with Noepe. From the fishing
shores to the inland woodlands, from the sand plains to the glacial ponds,
the Island has provided for its people. And the Wampanoag have given back
through wise stewardship of the land and sea.”
"Brian Patterson, president of the United South and Eastern Tribes, wrote
to Salazar on behalf of the organization's 25 federally recognized member
tribes to support the Wampanoags' efforts to assure that the Cape Wind
project is not developed "at the expense of ancient tribal cultural and spiritual
practice and beliefs."
"The waterways around the United States are not vacant spaces. They belong
to the history and culture of the coastal peoples of America," Patterson
wrote.
"The particular waters of Nantucket Sound are essential to spiritual
purposes that go to the heart of the Wampanoags' identity as the People of the
First Light," Patterson wrote.
_http://www.wampanoagtribe.net/Pages/Wampanoag_Way/other_
(http://www.wampanoagtribe.net/Pages/Wampanoag_Way/other)
_http://www.indiancountrytoday.com/national/82379187.html_
(http://www.indiancountrytoday.com/national/82379187.html)
Cheryl Andrews-Maltais Chairwoman of the
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) said in my presence when Secretary
Salazar visited Cape Cod:
"The idea of blasting our ancients' remains is repugnant."
An excellent video presentation by Tribal Historic Preservation Officers,
THPO, The Federally Recognized Wampanoag of Gay Head Aquinnah and the
Federally Recognized Mashpee Wampanoag, and Dr. Tom King:
_http://www.allmediapro.com/drtomking.html_
(http://www.allmediapro.com/drtomking.html)
ENERGY TRIBUNE
Apr. 06, 2010
By David G. Tuerck executive director of the Beacon Hill Institute and
chairman and professor of economics at Suffolk University in Boston.
'Against the Wind: Some Promising Developments in New England'
excerpt:
"Over the past few days, there have been two unrelated but promising
developments, both in New England, in the debate over wind power. The first was
a finding by the federal Advisory Council on Historic Preservation that a
wind project slated for construction in Massachusetts coastal waters would
inflict “pervasive” and “destructive” harm on the seabed and on neighboring
historic properties. The second was a decision by the Rhode Island Public
Utilities Commission prohibiting the purchase of power from eight wind
turbines also to be situated in coastal waters..."
_http://www.energytribune.com/articles.cfm?aid=3743_
(http://www.energytribune.com/articles.cfm?aid=3743)
1970’s 1980’s Federal and State Efforts to Make Nantucket Sound a
National Marine Sanctuary Several Document links:
_http://www.house.gov/delahunt/nansound.shtml_
(http://www.house.gov/delahunt/nansound.shtml)
In a message dated 4/5/2010 12:05:03 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
Wendy_Nicholas at nthp.org writes:
In fact, the tribes have been raising these issues since the beginning of
the review process many years ago, and preservationists, including the
National Trust, have called on the lead federal agency to take those and other
grave preservation concerns seriously since that time. Our voices fell on
deaf ears, for the most part, and Cape Wind has inaccurately but
successfully characterized preservation concerns as frivolous and/or late. We strongly
support MHC's opinion and NPS's determination of NR eligibility, both of
which were based on information from the tribes (the authority on these
matters), as well as extensive research. Viewed in light of well-established
criteria for Traditional Cultural Properties and NR designation, this was not
a stretch. For information on the historic preservation issues related to
Cape Wind and the deficiencies of the federal process, you might be
interested to read _http://blogs.nationaltrust.org/preservationnation/?p=9186_
(http://blogs.nationaltrust.org/preservationnation/?p=9186) .
Wendy Nicholas | Director, Northeast Office
National Trust for Historic Preservation | 7 Faneuil Hall Marketplace,
4th Floor. Boston, MA 02109
Phone: 617-523-0885 | Fax: 617-523-1199 | Email:
_wendy_nicholas at nthp.org_ (mailto:wendy_nicholas at nthp.org) . _www.PreservationNation.org_
(http://www.preservationnation.org/)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/private/masshistpres/attachments/20100406/cb093fc0/attachment.htm>
More information about the MassHistPres
mailing list