[MassHistPres] Demolition Delay
d-mountain at comcast.net
d-mountain at comcast.net
Fri Oct 8 23:15:26 EDT 2010
In addition to extending your demolition delay bylaw you might want to include an option in your subdivision bylaws to give developers bonus units in return for putting a preservation restriction on historic structures. We have done this in Newbury as part of our OSRD bylaw and it has been well received by subdivision proponents. For example, see the description of the Caldwell Farm project on the Mass. Smart Growth website:
http://www.mass.gov/envir/smart_growth_toolkit/pages/CS-osrd-newbury.html
Dave Mountain, Newbury Planning Board
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 19:37:13 GMT
From: "jjgiiilaw at juno.com"
Subject: [MassHistPres] Demolition delay
To: masshistpres at cs.umb.edu
Message-ID: <20101008.153713.13305.0 at webmail02.dca.untd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Tewksbury is in the process of preparing a town meeting article which would extend its current
Demo Delay By-Law from its current very short 90 day restriction to something longer. Does
anyone have any thoughts as to period which provides maximum return on building saved/adapted
etc. Any other insight on how to leverage by law to save buildings as opposed to just putting off the
inevitable would also be appreciated. I appreciate the preservation communities response to this
inquiry along with some helpful replies on priors.
Regards,
Jay Gaffney
Tewksbury Historical Commission
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/private/masshistpres/attachments/20101009/224b28c0/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the MassHistPres
mailing list