[MassHistPres] additions

[Dennis De Witt]

Chris

Au contraire . . . . 

In Brookline, and I suspect at least some other places, an addition that effectively reaches the demolition threshold by removing a roof or covering one side triggers demo delay and thus often also design review.

Dennis


On Feb 13, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Chris Skelly <Skelly-MHC at comcast.net> wrote:

> Deanna, additions are not typically ever reviewed as part of a demolition delay bylaw and this does not sound like a good avenue to pursue.  If you are concerned about demolitions, additions and new construction in the National Register District, Chatham should consider a MGL Chapter 40C Local Historic District.  I’d be happy to discuss options with you further. 
>  
> Chris.
>  
> Christopher C. Skelly
> Director of Local Government Programs
> Massachusetts Historical Commission
> 220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, MA 02125
> Christopher.Skelly at state.ma.us
>  
> From: masshistpres-bounces at cs.umb.edu [mailto:masshistpres-bounces at cs.umb.edu] On Behalf Of Deanna Ruffer
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:56 PM
> To: masshistpres at cs.umb.edu
> Subject: [MassHistPres] additions
>  
> Folks I’m curious how additions are handled under demolition delay bylaws in other communities.  Further if a demolition delay bylaw does provide specific jurisdiction over additions does it give the Historical Commission jurisdiction over the proposed design of the addition.  If not, how is the jurisdiction restricted.
>  
> In Chatham, additions are exempted in the definition of demolition.  However, in the past applications for building permits for additions to structures more than 75 years old or in the historic district have been referred to the  Historical Commission for approval prior to issuance of the building permit on the basis that such additions involve the removal of exterior walls or roofs and thus the potential removal of historical material.
>  
> This is now being questioned by some of the local builders and attorneys who are taking the position that additions are exempt from such review.  As a result, the Historical Commission, with the support and assistance of the Community Development Department and a local attorney, was proposing an amendment to the bylaw for the purpose of clarifying that additions are subject to CHC jurisdiction.  Of concern to the Board of Selectmen is if a proposed amendment was clarifying or expanding the scope of the demolition delay bylaw and whether the intended clarification was actually endowing the CHC with design revie authority over additions. 
>  
> So, we are back to the drawing board.  We welcome your thoughts and examples of adopted language specific to additions. 
>  
> Deanna L. Ruffer
> Community Development Director
> Town of Chatham
> Community Development Department
> Town Annex
> 261 George Ryder Road
> Chatham, MA 02633
> (508) 945-5168 x475
> (774) 212-1554 (cell)
> druffer at chatham-ma.gov
>  
> Kindly remember that the Secretary of State has deemed most email a public record.
>  
> ******************************
> For administrative questions regarding this list, please contactChristopher.Skelly at state.ma.us directly.  PLEASE DO NOT "REPLY" TO THE WHOLE LIST.
> MassHistPres mailing list
> MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu
> http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/listinfo/masshistpres
> ********************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/private/masshistpres/attachments/20140213/2649ac8e/attachment.htm>