[MassHistPres] what's in a name?

[Jill Fisher]

Dennis, I appreciate your comments on the various & overlapping roles.  I would only add that many if not most towns &/or counties have Historical Societies whose role it is to document the historical ephemera such as newspapers, letters, clothing, etc.  Where this is the case, I'm not sure that adding an Architectural Preservation Commission along side a Historical [Preservation] Commission would be necessary.  Perhaps it would set up competition for qualified volunteers & possibly create turf battles.
 
Just a thought.




Jill Fisher, AICP
Larson Fisher Associates
PO Box 1394
Woodstock, NY  12498
845-679-5054
jillfisher47 at hotmail.com
 
www.larsonfisher.com

 
From: djd184 at verizon.net
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:50:49 -0500
To: masshistpres at cs.umb.edu
Subject: Re: [MassHistPres] what's in a name?

Marcia
Let me share a thought re the term "Historic Preservation Commission"
As you know, Historic Commissions and Historic District Commissions are established under different MGL chapters.  40c allows an LHD commission to merge with and subsume the role of the Historical Commission.
When Brookline became a CLG in the '80s it merged its commissions, in part because we were under the impression we had to do so to become a CLG.  That is now not the case, if it ever was.   We also adopted the name Preservation Commission — in part because we were sick of hearing "Hysterical Commission" yuk yuk!
The effect has been that Brookline has a commission that is fairly good at LHDs, Demo Delays, etc.  Indeed it risks being swamped by its own success.
The downside is that the role of the traditional historical commission has largely been lost — and has been difficult to argue for at budget time.
Altho archival materials and memories need to be "preserved," perhaps the term preservation in the commission's name implicitly suggests in our culture that the focus is mostly on buildings and less on their cultural, artifactual, and historical context than once would have been the case.
Altho the Preservation Commission's hard working staff could justifiably shoot me for suggesting this, arguably Brookline would be better served by having both an Architectural Preservation Commission and an Historical Commission.
Dennis De Witt

On Feb 17, 2014, at 12:31 PM, Marcia Starkey <mdstarkey at crocker.com> wrote:The Fall 1992 “Preservation Advocate” from MHC included a message from the Chairman which said : Massachusetts is unique in that it provides for a municipal body – local historical commissions– to carry out preservation planning at the local level.”   Two thoughts: is Massachusetts still unique as bodies authorized by state law? and is the title “historical commission” (rather than “historic preservation commission” ) still preferable?   Marcia StarkeyGreenfield Historical Commission         ******************************
For administrative questions regarding this list, please contactChristopher.Skelly at state.ma.us directly.  PLEASE DO NOT "REPLY" TO THE WHOLE LIST.
MassHistPres mailing list
MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu
http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/listinfo/masshistpres
********************************


******************************
For administrative questions regarding this list, please contact Christopher.Skelly at state.ma.us directly.  PLEASE DO NOT "REPLY" TO THE WHOLE LIST.
MassHistPres mailing list
MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu
http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/listinfo/masshistpres
******************************** 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/mailman/private/masshistpres/attachments/20140219/67dab8b5/attachment.htm>