[MassHistPres] Preferably Preserved Significant Structures

[Roughan, Michael]

Hopkinton last week had public hearings for 3 "historically significant"' structures that the owners applied for demolition permits. For two of the structures the commission determined they were "preferably preserved" and instituted a 6-month demolition delay. The third structure was determined to not be "preferably preserved" based on the applicant submitting plans and elevations prepared by an architect indicating the barn to be demolished would be replicated in new construction. The following issues were discussed during deliberations and advice from this List Serv is requested:


1.       What precedents are there for assuring that (after determination an existing structure is not "preferably preserved") an applicant who represents they will "replicate" a structure, actually does so?

2.       When the Commission encourages an applicant to preserve part of a structure, is it best practice not to release a 'partial demolition' permit until an agreement can be reached? Should the Commission insist on specific plans and elevations rather than a narrative of intent?

3.       One of the structures (1794) has significance both as a structure and for the past events / occupants of the structure. Has anyone tried to extend their demo delay time period for a project already under a demo delay? Our six month maximum demo delay has not seemed to be an impediment for developers taking 4-6 months to go through other town committees. Is a single structure historic district a viable option given the time frame? (Hopkinton Town Meeting is scheduled for May 2019)

Regards,

....Mike

Michael Roughan, AIA, EDAC, LEED AP, ACHA
Chairman - Hopkinton Historical Commission

Town of Hopkinton
18 Main Street
Hopkinton, MA 01748

D 617.357.7725 M 617.784.6463


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/pipermail/masshistpres/attachments/20190107/f718d405/attachment-0001.html>