[MassHistPres] Threatened difficult Paul Rudolph masterpiece

[Elizabeth Ware]

The chapel in this building is a very spiritual and a  stunningly beautiful space.  If you haven’t visited, you should see it.  It’s quite a contrast from the exterior treatment of the building.
While I am not generally a fan of this period in architecture, the building should be finished as originally designed.
My understanding is that there was supposed to be a connector building towards the rear of the buildings on Cambridge Street.  Without this connector, the full Rudolph vision was never really executed and didn’t really make sense to many without the completed building.
A wrecking ball would be a crime.

Betsy Ware

Director of Community Development
Town of Dracut, Ma.
Telephone: 978-453-4557

From: MassHistPres [mailto:masshistpres-bounces at cs.umb.edu] On Behalf Of Dennis De Witt
Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 10:30 AM
To: MHC Preservation listserv <masshistpres at cs.umb.edu>
Subject: [MassHistPres] Threatened difficult Paul Rudolph masterpiece

For those who have not seen today’s Boston Globe, the letter below is worth noting.

The original Globe story is at
https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2019/10/30/state-puts-hurley-building-downtown-boston-market/U5eHjr3ZvWkt4H8dFXA4yL/story.html?p1=Article_Inline_Text_Link

Denis De Witt
Brookline

Spare the wrecking ball, and embrace challenge of a restored Hurley Building

[The state is looking to redevelop the Charles F. Hurley Building.]The state is looking to redevelop the Charles F. Hurley Building.DAVID L. RYAN/GLOBE STAFF/DAVID L RYAN, GLOBE STAFF
Today’s real estate market values modernity. Jon Chesto’s Oct. 31 article (“State to redevelop a prime site,”<https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2019/10/30/state-puts-hurley-building-downtown-boston-market/U5eHjr3ZvWkt4H8dFXA4yL/story.html?p1=Article_Inline_Text_Link> Business) conveys the state’s cautionary tone about the challenges of redeveloping the Charles F. Hurley Building and maintaining its architectural heritage. Yet to focus only on the Hurley Building’s flaws ignores the opportunities it offers.
There’s a craftsmanship to Brutalist design. Early images of the Hurley Building visualize a proud structure made beautiful and softer by rounded, flowing accents on the ground plane and landscaping. Now it’s shrouded by trees, fences, and towering, shadowy buildings. New pedestrian pathways encourage people to walk away rather than toward it.
So, the multimillion-dollar question is: What’s worth keeping? The building’s stepped structure, its unique shapes, and the prospect of creating private balconies all present residential and hotel uses as possible options, while improving the nooks created by the building’s shape could make public space more private. Future development should enhance the building and architect Paul Rudolph’s vision.
Rather than letting the demolition ball swing, there’s a chance to embrace and restore the connections and design features that once made the Hurley Building a sculpture against Boston’s skyline. We just need to welcome the challenge.
Haril Pandaya
Director of asset strategy
CBT

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/pipermail/masshistpres/attachments/20191112/ae674980/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 22052 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/pipermail/masshistpres/attachments/20191112/ae674980/attachment-0001.jpg>